A paradigm shift on drone-surveillance.info (DSI)

The main normative perspective here on DSI will change significantly because of new information presented in an article I published 12/04/21:

Woke libertine Big Tech has won the culture and surveillance war but is not out of the woods yet.

From today (13/04/21) I will start to write articles that are directly or indirectly influenced by a new ethical and normative paradigm in favor of the long-term goal of one day creating what I call non-zoological intelligence (NZI). The latter is the same as post-animalistic intelligence, a conceptualization of AI-enhanced mind/brains that is meant to be a philosophical/ideological alternative to woke transhumanism while still having the goal of changing original humanity by we one day becoming highly advanced cyborgs in a distant future.

It may take two centuries but that’s just a blink in the history of biological life. The first significant steps to becoming cyborgs have already been taken:

Neuralink gaming works now, using the mind only, ape mind that is…

I’m well aware of tech hype and glad people expose it, as seen in this 2021 article for example:

I have one of the most advanced prosthetic arms in the world — and I hate it

“Being a cyborg is cool right now, thanks in large part to gee-whiz media coverage. But actually using a bionic arm can really suck.”

Nevertheless I feel reasonably confident that neuroscientists and bioengineers will have the ability to turn humans into very advanced cyborgs in around 2222. By “advanced” I mean two things:

1) brains and neurological systems tweaked in a way that makes it impossible to experience psychological pain such as the cortisol stress of boredom, thereby calming the mind, which in itself can help people to quickly enter deep meditation or prayer, like jhanas for example or the rapture which Teresa of Avila experienced.

2) having bodies where only AI-tweaked brains are made of organic biological material while the rest is non-organic, so that people can receive warnings when being in danger but never experience physical pain.

1) and 2) will make all animalistic desires unnecessary, since there will be no need to engage in acts of eating or reproduction. Sounds boring? No, because the ability to experience boredom will not exist. Jhanas are better than sex, better than psychedelics. Everyone will be like enlightened Zen monks or Christian nuns, for example. There will be no gender, since all bodies are machines. There will be no races, because machine bodies don’t have organic skin color. Almost all forms of domination and oppression will disappear when cyborgs have painless machine bodies without animalistic desires. Basically, this will be a relatively good post-biological world, arguably a great way of living, depending on your perspective (but it presupposes that Big Tech is willing to create AI cyborgs with the qualities and characteristics recommended here).

If you don’t like the cyborg future described above don’t complain about it to me. I’m not the one building AI cyborgs. Big Tech is doing it, for some unwise reason, but since it’s happening and nobody stops it one might as well go along for the ride, giving positive advice instead of pointlessly complaining about it.

Now I want to accelerate the process toward creating AGI and cyborgs, partly because my “higher self” likes the Christian anti-natalist theology of St. Paul who recommended people to live in celibacy. Non-animalistic cyborgs will not even reflect upon celibacy since natural reproduction will be a thing of the past, something only unprogressive and unenlightened humans did centuries ago.

From today I will write articles that have a spin in favor of Big Tech and/or decentralized open source indy-AI. To mark this paradigm shift I will put all new articles in categories that have titles starting with the number 1, in order to differentiate them from all the earlier articles I have published when criticizing libertine woke Big Tech surveillance. All earlier articles will still be available, so that readers can compare the old paradigm with the new one and freely decide which alternative they like best, original humanity today or a cyborg society in the future.

For more info read:

The rationality of corporations being woke/libertine, and why that’s arguably a “good” paradigm

People don’t deserve freedom if not fighting surveillance

A new paradigm different from both cultural conservatism and libertine woke Big Tech surveillance

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s