Introduction

January 15, 2022

New tech developments show that drone surveillance and the Internet of Things (IoT) are a threat to democracy.

Read the rest of this entry »

Wired: surveillance … “little closer to omniscience”

January 15, 2022

Wired (Feb 04, 2021) describes in the following a surveillance system that is potentially genocidal, and it exists today, operated by the police in cities like New York.

Read the rest of this entry »

A tactic of conventional asymmetric warfare that reduces the need for WMDs if Cold War 2 leads to a major conflagration

January 15, 2022

Read the rest of this entry »

defining wokeness

January 14, 2022

Read the rest of this entry »

Wearable air purifiers are good from the viewpoint of evil tactical bioterrorists

January 3, 2022

Read the rest of this entry »

There is no vertical hierarchy of authority in secular societies, only a horizontal centralization of power created when those with weapons and technology force the rest to comply

December 23, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Former US Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton: corporations use identity politics to divert attention away from oligarchic power and wealth

December 14, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Systemic racism, mass immigration, social unrest and surveillance in the West

December 11, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Be civil toward those who are different

November 29, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Hacking computer monitors to spy, steal data and manipulate what you see

November 28, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

How NSA can win conservative hearts and minds, and thereby contribute to depolarize the culture war

November 17, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The silver lining of WW3 and the pointlessness of terrorism against (woke) surveillance states

October 27, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The Intercept: “HOW COVERT AGENTS INFILTRATE THE INTERNET TO MANIPULATE, DECEIVE, AND DESTROY REPUTATIONS”

October 13, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

News about war and chips in Taiwan (and Ukraine)

October 7, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

DSM-5 needs to include two new mental disorders: Musk Syndrome and Silicon Valley Disorder

September 15, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The 5th turning of DSI: militant activism against surveillance is hopeless but never surrender the old ways in the culture war

September 14, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Microsoft soldiers coming to your neighborhood

August 21, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Tactics and strategies, sources and references

August 21, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The last stage of drone-surveillance.info (DSI): full circle

August 21, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Phase 3 of DSI

August 3, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

ID theft in online debates is a form of censorship, a violation of free political speech

July 29, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

A paradigm shift on drone-surveillance.info (DSI)

July 13, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Amazon appears to no longer be a potential target for domestic bioterrorism

July 13, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The mafia empires of EU, America, Russia and China

July 13, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Should the Goebbels Award go to Elder Scrolls Online?

June 22, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Woke libertine Big Tech has won the culture and surveillance war but is not out of the woods yet.

April 12, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Bioterror and vaccine surveillance in a Cold War 2 scenario

April 8, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Why we are at war

April 2, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Surveillance and culture war from a scientific viewpoint

April 2, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

academic militant activism “uncensored”

April 2, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The difference between threatening Bezos and warning him of future dangers

April 1, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Alternatives to AI military defense systems

March 15, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

DARPA wants to create transhuman soldiers who eat grass

March 15, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Militant resistance bogged down in information overload

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The fake “anti-racism” of Big Tech

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Present pro-Big Tech facts and narratives here

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Dismantle, not destroy, surveillance tech in public areas

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

How to spread info about militant tactics and strategies

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Here’s why drone-surveillance.info isn’t inciting illegality

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The ethics of drone-surveillance.info

March 6, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Argument against DSI: agent provocateurs and false flags

March 5, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

Do you have a solution to stopping Big Tech surveillance?

February 24, 2021

Read the rest of this entry »

The other actor most likely to use a bioweapon: a rogue faction of an intelligence agency in a developing country about to get hit by devastating climate changes

January 18, 2022

It’s in principle impossible to predict who will start a manmade viral outbreak, since it has never happened (as far as we know in modern times). The chance of this occuring may therefore seem low, hypothetical.

On the other hand, if you believe I’m just scaremongering, why don’t you share my articles about bioterrorism on social media? Why doesn’t mainstream media have a free, open and deeply serious discussion about the pros and cons of bioterrorism if it’s basically an unrealistic scenario? If it’s nothing but a “movie-plot threat” it shouldn’t even be illegal to openly glorify bioterrorism, since the threat isn’t real in any case, similar to how you (in Norway) can legally incite someone to use a magic spell as a murder weapon, because everyone knows the weapon isn’t real.

The fact is that many avoid using the Internet to share hazardous info about bioweapons because they fear the risk is real.

My online articles about bioterrorism are only read by 0 to 3 readers on average, so the risk is very low in this case, fortunately. All my readers are flagged by NSA.

A solo bioterrorist or (rogue) biowarriors inside an intelligence agency will only release a deadly virus if their own core values are facing an existential threat. The woke libertine panopticon is an existential threat to cultural conservatism, and that is why I guess the perpetrator of a bioattack will probably be a conservative who got a lab science degree and a relatively low level of empathy. This lab technician may already work inside the US military, like Bruce Ivins. The other kind of actor is probably a rogue patriotic intelligence officer in a country near Equator who is seeing that excessive consumption in rich Western states is literally killing his own country because of the climate changes it causes. Covid-19 will have taught him that a virus can shut down the polluting economic consumption machine of the West. Southern poor countries are also conservative, religious. It’s therefore likely that intelligence agents or military officers in a developing country will be disgusted or offended by the woke libertinism of the US/EU and fear the Western panopticon.

There is not enough time to invent and mass produce new technologies that can save the world from a global climate catastrophe which is going to destroy equatorial countries in particular.

Foreign Affairs:

Nuclear Energy Will Not Be the Solution to Climate Change

“There Is Not Enough Time for Nuclear Innovation to Save the Planet”

FYI: electric cars need electricity.

Raise your hand if you can answer this question: from where do we get electricity?

Either from fossil fuels and nuclear plants or renewables, but the latter are unreliable sources of energy.

Big Tech data centers also consume electricity and resources like hell, as explained here.

Even supporters of environmentalism in the West consume so much that they too are contributors to climate change.

Vox:

Wealthier people produce more carbon pollution — even the “green” ones

“Good environmental intentions are swamped by the effects of money.”

In one way it’s therefore very strange that nobody in an equatorial country has started a pandemic. From their longterm perspective it’s an obvious thing to do, if you have the same low level of empathy as a fighter pilot willing to bomb children as collateral damage. White people would have done it, history proves that, see Hiroshima or google Fort Pitt and smallpox.

Digression: I’m a white-skinned nationalist, i.e. an anti-imperialist, so I criticize all empires, including European imperialists.

Always remember that no individual uses a viral bioweapon unless he perceives his own core values to be in danger of extinction because of an existential threat.

Russia and China will therefore not use a bioweapon unless one of these empires is close to being annihilated.

Russia for example is so far north it may become more powerful, relatively speaking, if carbon emissions continue. China depends on global trade to feed its own population, which means that Beijing has little or no interest in releasing a virus that destroys global supply chains.

Western environmentalists also enjoy the fruits of globalized consumption, despite complaining about it a lot. Therefore it’s very unlikely that any of these humanists who believe in universal ethics is willing to become an extremely unethical bioterrorist.

A military officer seeing his family being literally cooked to death in Africa, Asia or Latin America, because of the wet-bulb effect, will have an obvious reason to attack those causing this climate change, using any evil weapon available.

If militant conservatives travel to equatorial countries and lawfully inform high-ranking people about global warming caused by the woke libertine panopticon (that has outsourced production to China etc), but without mentioning anything about bioweapons, then it will not take much time before intelligence officers and military leaders will realize what has to be done. I’m almost 100% certain however that they know this already, after observing climate changes and watching how Covid-19 has slowed down the Western economy, reducing pollution in cities in 2020.

For the record, I use computer games to take focus away from the discomfort of narcolepsy, so I have no personal interest in supporting anyone who tries to use a bioweapon to destroy Big Tech supply chains that make it possible to buy CPUs and GPUs.